Showing posts with label INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY STUDIES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY STUDIES. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 December 2023

Examine the theme of identity in Mahesh Dattani's Tara.

 Examine the theme of identity in Mahesh Dattani's Tara.

 Ans. If we look at identity as representing a person's self conception, I think that the theme of identity in Tara relates to how the individual's notion of self collides with the external, social construction. Dattani applies this in terms of gender in India. Born as conjoined twins, Tara and Chandan, girl and boy, are to be separated. Their parents decide that the boy, Chandan, is to be shown preferential treatment. The way in which the separation happens displays more advantage to Chandan, making Tara's condition difficult and leading to her death. In examining the theme of identity, Dattani suggests that subjective constructions active choice as to how they construct their own sense of self. Identity becomes the net result of our choices. Dattan argues that in forming our identity, human beings are what they choose to tolerate. Thus, a world in which there is gender separation and prejudice are external impositions that we internalize. Chandan recognizes this as his identity is formed. While he might be "Dan" to the rest of the world, his own identity is impacted through the collision of social constructions of gender and his own internal sense of love towards his sister: "Like we've always been. Inseparable. The way we started in life. Two lives and one body in one comfortable womb.

Do an analysis of Mahesh Dattani's Tara from the Perspective of Gender discrimination.

 Do an analysis of Mahesh Dattani's Tara from the Perspective of Gender discrimination.

 Ans. Let's do an analysis on the basis of gender discrimination Mahesh Dattani is one of the best contemporary playwrights in India who occupies a very distinct and unique place in the realm of Indian English drama. His plays are performed and read almost everywhere in India and abroad. One of the reasons for Dattani s success as a dramatist appears to be his artistic response to the problems of our time. Mahesh Dattani has sensitively identified the problems troubling Indian society and has creatively presented these problems in his plays. His presentation of problems from real life situations is significant contribution to Indian English Drama. Among modern Indian playwrights, he stands forthwith singular distinctness, striking artistic perception, and immense dramatic guts. He is the most serious contemporary dramatist in Indian drama in English. He takes up serious problems prevailing in urban India. He, very successfully, gives voice to the problems and sufferings of the marginalised people of our society. The success of Mahesh Dattani as a dramatist rests upon his themes and his unique way of treating them. He is an experimenter who loves to consistently experiment with the stage space. The subjects of most of his plays are hitherto unexplored. The audience gets startled to know about the undercover reality of the society. These plays make readers sensible to the happenings around them.

It is argued, "Every work of art is a projection from the interior realm into exterior space where in becoming incarnated it achieves consciousness of itself". It signifies that self-confessional mode of elucidation of eternal reality has a greater authenticity and significance. In order to reconstruct the concept of, self within the limits of a literary work, a creative artist must keep his, creative self apart from his creative work. Beena Agarwal observes: A dramatist in comparison of poet has a better opportunity to eliminate his personality from his work and the issues taken in the literary text be developed through the consciousness of the characters. Dattani possesses an exceptional sensibility for the suffering in society born out of gender discrimination. His vision is not confined to socio religious myths only, but he delves deep to examine the psychic reactions of those who are the victims of them. In India, literature of all languages have penned down the pathetic plight of women. And thereby have raised voices against this inhumane treatment to women. Indian writing in English is no exception to this. One thing should be noted here that feminism has got mixed responses from all over the world. Feminism has given birth to two opposite attitudes namely pro-feministic and antifeministic attitude. The writers who possess favorable attitude towards feminism are called pro-feminist and those who oppose this attitude are designated as antifeministic. Mahesh Dattani belongs to the former category, i.e., the writer with the pro-feministic attitude

What is personification? How has Wordsworth employed this figure of speech in the poem?

 What is personification? How has Wordsworth employed this figure of speech in the poem?

Ans. Personification is a figure of speech in which an inanimate object or abstract concept is spoken of as though it were offered with life or with human feelings. In the sonnet, the poet William Wordsworth employed this figure of speech by personifying the city of London, the river Thames and the houses. Like a living being the London city wears the garment of the morning beauty, the river Thames is gliding of its own sweet will and the houses seem sleeping. 3. Emily Dickinson: '341 After Great Pain' After great pain, a formal feeling comes - (372) BY EMILY DICKINSON After great pain, a formal feeling comesThe Nerves sit ceremonious, like Tombs - The stiff Heart questions 'was it He, that bore,' And 'Yesterday, or Centuries before"? The Feet, mechanical, go roundA Wooden way Of Ground, or Air, or Ought – Regardless grown, A Quartz contentment, like a stoneThis is the Hour of LeadRemembered, if outlived, As Freezing persons, recollect the Snow

First-Chill - then Stupor - then the letting goSUMMARY The speaker notes that following great pain, "a formal feeling" often sets in, during which the "Nerves" are solemn and "ceremonious, like Tombs." The heart questions whether it ever really endured such pain and whether it was really so recent ("The stiff Heart questions was it He, that bore, / And Yesterday, or Centuries before?"). The feet continue to plod mechanically, with a wooden way, and the heart feels a stone-like contentment. This, the speaker says, is “the Hour of Lead," and if the person experiencing it survives this Hour, he or she will remember it in the same way that "Freezing persons" remember the snow: "First-Chill-then Stupor-then the letting go-"

Do a character analysis of Lydia Bennet

 Do a character analysis of Lydia Bennet?

Ans. Lydia is the youngest and wildest Bennet daughter. She is her mother's favorite because like Mrs. Bennet, she is preoccupied with gossip, socializing, and men. Lydia is described as having "high animal spirits and a sort of natural self- consequence." She is attractive and charismatic, but she is also reckless and impulsive Lydia's behavior frequently embarrasses her older sisters, and when Lydia receives the invitation to go to Brighton, Lizzy makes impassioned speech about her sister's character. She explains that "our respectability in the world must be affected by the wild volatility, the assurance and disdain of all restraint which mark Lydia's character" Lizzy also articulates her fear that Lydia is on the road to becoming "a flirt in the worst and meanest degree of flirtation." Lydia has an innate tendency toward wild and selfish behavior, but as a character she also sheds light on the failings of her parents, and father in particular. Because of her young age and lack of education, Lydia is presented as not entirely culpable for her behavior because she lacks parental guidance and discipline. Although Lydia seems initially a harmless and entertaining character, her elopement with Wickham shows that her selfish actions can cause real damage. In the note explaining that she has run off with Wickham, Lydia writes "What a good joke it will be!" From Lizzy's point of view, however, the focus is "the humiliation, the misery, she was bringing on them all." Lydia does not think about the repercussions of her actions for herself or for her sisters.

She does not learn any responsibility or sense of propriety over the course of the plot. Although Lydia's reputation is barely salvaged through a hasty marriage, she focuses on her own importance, declaring, "Jane, I take your place now, and you must go lower, because I am a married woman." She spends her married life relying on the generosity of her sisters and "moving from place to place in quest of a cheap situation." In a novel where many other characters experience psychological development and growth, Lydia remains foolish and headstrong throughout  

What is the effect when Mr. Bennet says that he has visited Mr. Bingley?

 What is the effect when Mr. Bennet says that he has visited Mr. Bingley? 

Ans. Although Mr. Bennet has rejected his wife's suggestion that he should visit Mr. Bingley, in reality he loses no time in paying a social visit to that man who has taken residence at Netherfield Park. When he discloses the matter, there is a lot of excitement in the family. Mrs. Bennet appreciates her husband's behaviour and for making an acquaintance with Mr. Bingley. Mrs. Bennet wishes that Mr. Bingley would choose Lydia as his would be wife and he may dance with her at a ball. Lydia is also one step forward to accept these two ideas as told by her mother. Even, Lydia feels pride about this matter.

What role does prejudice play in the novel?

 What role does prejudice play in the novel?

 Ans. Repeatedly, the novel warns against trusting one's first impressions or prejudices. Elizabeth's first impression of Mr. Darcy is that he is arrogant and aloof, but in the end, she loves him deeply. Conversely, her first impression of Wickham is that he is charming and good-looking, but he turns out to be a liar and a cheat. The Bennets' first impression of Lady Catherine is admiration for her great wealth and status, but they eventually despise her and her outdated attitudes. Over the course of the novel, several characters revise their prejudices as loathing turns to admiration and vice versa.

Write a character analysis of Elizabeth

 Write a character analysis of Elizabeth?

Ans. The second daughter in the Bennet family, and the most intelligent and quickwitted, Elizabeth is the protagonist of Pride and Prejudice and one of the most wellknown female characters in English literature. Her admirable qualities are numerous she is lovely, clever, and, in a novel defined by dialogue, she converses as brilliantly as anyone. Her honesty, virtue, and lively wit enable her to rise above the nonsense and bad behavior that pervade her class-bound and often spiteful society. Nevertheless, her sharp tongue and tendency to make hasty judgments often lead her astray; Pride and Prejudice is essentially the story of how she (and her true love, Darcy) overcome all obstacles-including their own personal failings-to find romantic happiness. Elizabeth must not only cope with a hopeless mother, a distant father, two badly behaved younger siblings, and several snobbish, antagonizing females, she must also overcome her own mistaken impressions of Darcy, which initially lead her to reject his proposals of marriage. Her charms are sufficient to keep him interested, fortunately, while she navigates familial and social turmoil. As she gradually comes to recognize the nobility of Darcy's character, she realizes the error of her initial prejudice against him

Write the summary of Jane Austen's Pride & Prejudice

 https://riturajbindass.blogspot.com/2023/12/previous-years-questions-paper-subject.html


1. Write the summary of Jane Austen's Pride & Prejudice

ans-

Charles Bingley has rented the manor of Netherfield Park causes a great stir in the nearby village of Longbourn, especially in the Bennet household. The Bennets have five unmarried daughters-from oldest to youngest, Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty, and Lydia-and Mrs. Bennet is desperate to see them all married. After Mr. Bennet pays a social visit to Mr. Bingley, the Bennets attend a ball at which Mr. Bingley is present. He is taken with Jane and spends much of the evening dancing with her. His close friend, Mr. Darcy, is less pleased with the evening and haughtily refuses to dance with Elizabeth, which makes everyone view him as arrogant and obnoxious. At social functions over subsequent weeks, however, Mr. Darcy finds himself increasingly attracted to Elizabeth's charm and intelligence. Jane's friendship with Mr. Bingley also continues to burgeon, and Jane pays a visit to the Bingley mansion. On her journey to the house she is caught in a downpour and catches ill, forcing her to stay at Netherfield for several days. In order to tend to Jane, Elizabeth hikes through muddy fields and arrives with a spattered dress, much to the disdain of the snobbish Miss Bingley, Charles Bingley's sister. Miss Bingley's spite only increases when she notices that Darcy, whom she is pursuing, pays quite a bit of attention to Elizabeth. When Elizabeth and Jane return home, they find Mr. Collins visiting their household. Mr. Collins is a young clergyman who stands to inherit Mr. Bennet's property, which has been "entailed," meaning that it can only be passed down to male heirs. Mr. Collins is a pompous fool, though he is quite enthralled by the Bennet girls.

Shortly after his arrival, he makes a proposal of marriage to Elizabeth. She turns him down, wounding his pride. Meanwhile, the Bennet girls have become friendly with militia officers stationed in a nearby town. Among them is Wickham, a handsome young soldier who is friendly toward Elizabeth and tells her how Darcy cruelly cheated him out of an inheritance. London, much to Jane's dismay. A further shock arrives with the news that Mr. Collins has become engaged to Charlotte Lucas, Elizabeth's best friend and the poor daughter of a local knight. Charlotte explains to Elizabeth that she is getting older and needs the match for financial reasons. Charlotte and Mr. Collins get married and Elizabeth promises to visit them at their new home. As winter progresses, Jane visits the city to see friends (hoping also that she might see Mr. Bingley). However, Miss Bingley visits her and behaves rudely, while Mr. Bingley fails to visit her at all. The marriage prospects for the Bennet girls appear bleak. That spring, Elizabeth visits Charlotte, who now lives near the home of Mr. Collins's patron, Lady Catherine de Bourgh, who is also Darcy's aunt. Darcy calls on Lady Catherine and encounters Elizabeth, whose presence leads him to make a number of visits to the Collins's home, where she is staying. One day, he makes a shocking proposal of marriage, which Elizabeth quickly refuses. She tells Darcy that she considers him arrogant and unpleasant, then scolds him for steering Bingley away from Jane and disinheriting Wickham. Darcy leaves her but shortly thereafter delivers a letter to her. In this letter, he admits that he urged Bingley to distance himself from Jane, but claims he did so only because he thought their romance was not serious. As for Wickham, he informs Elizabeth that the young officer is a liar and that the real cause of their disagreement was Wickham's attempt to elope with his young sister, Georgiana Darcy. This letter causes Elizabeth to reevaluate her feelings about Darcy. She returns home and acts coldly toward Wickham. The militia is leaving town, which makes the

younger, rather man-crazy Bennet girls distraught. Lydia manages to obtain permission from her father to spend the summer with an oid colonel in Brighton, where Wickham's regiment will be stationed. With the arrival of June, Elizabeth goes on another journey, this time with the Gardiners, who are relatives of the Bennets. The trip takes her to the North and eventually to the neighbourhood of Pemberley, Darcy's estate. She visits Pemberley, after making sure that Darcy is away, and delights in the building and grounds, while hearing from Darcy's servants that he is a wonderful, generous master. Suddenly, Darcy arrives and behaves cordially toward her. Making no mention of his proposal, he entertains the Gardiners and invites Elizabeth to meet his sister. Shortly thereafter, however, a letter arrives from home, telling Elizabeth that Lydia has eloped with Wickham and that the couple is nowhere to be found, which suggests that they may be living together out of wedlock. Fearful of the disgrace such a situation would bring on her entire family, Elizabeth hastens home. Mr. Gardiner and Mr. Bennet go off to search for Lydia, but Mr. Bennet eventually returns home emptyhanded. Just when all hope seems lost, a letter comes from Mr. Ga  

Wednesday, 27 December 2023

Elizabeth Bennet character NOTES

 Elizabeth Bennet is the protagonist in the 1813 novel Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. She is often referred to as Eliza or Lizzy by her friends and family. Elizabeth is the second child in a family of five daughters. Though the circumstances of the time and environment push her to seek a marriage of convenience for economic security, Elizabeth wishes to marry for love.

Elizabeth is regarded as the most admirable and endearing of Austen's heroines.[1] She is considered one of the most beloved characters in British literature[2] because of her complexity. Austen herself described Elizabeth as "as delightful a creature as ever appeared in print."[3]

Background[edit]

Elizabeth is the second eldest of the five Bennet sisters of the Longbourn estate, situated near the fictional market village of Meryton in Hertfordshire, England. She is 20 years old by the middle of the novel.[4] Elizabeth is described as an intelligent young woman, with "a lively, playful disposition, which delighted in anything ridiculous". She often presents a playful good-natured impertinence without being offensive. Early in the novel, she is depicted as being personally proud of her wit and her accuracy in judging the social behaviour and intentions of others.

Her father is a landowner, but his daughters cannot inherit because the estate is entailed upon the male line (it can only be inherited by male relatives). Upon Mr Bennet's death, Longbourn will therefore be inherited by his cousin and nearest male relation, Mr. William Collins, a clergyman for the Rosings Estate in Kent owned by Lady Catherine de Bourgh. This future provides the cause of Mrs Bennet's eagerness to marry her daughters off to wealthy men.

Elizabeth is her father's favourite, described by him as having "something more of quickness than her sisters". In contrast, she is the least dear to her mother, especially after Elizabeth refuses Mr Collins' marriage proposal. Her mother tends to contrast her negatively with her sisters Jane and Lydia, whom she considers superior in beauty and disposition, respectively, and fails to understand her husband's preference. Elizabeth is often upset and embarrassed by her mother's and three younger sisters' impropriety and silliness.

Within her neighbourhood, Elizabeth is considered a beauty and a charming young woman with "fine eyes", to which Mr. Darcy is first drawn. Darcy is later attracted more particularly to her "light and pleasing" figure, the "easy playfulness" of her manners, her personality and the liveliness of her mind, and eventually considers her "one of the handsomest women" in his acquaintance.

Analysis[edit]

From the beginning, opinions have been divided on the character. Anne Isabella Milbanke gave a glowing review of the novel, while Mary Russell Mitford criticizes Elizabeth's lack of taste.[5] The modern exegetes are torn between admiration for the vitality of the character and the disappointment of seeing Elizabeth intentionally suppress her verve[6] and submit, at least outwardly, to male authority.[7] In Susan Fraiman's essay "The Humiliation of Elizabeth Bennett", the author criticises the fact that Elizabeth must forgo her development as a woman in order to ensure the success of "ties among men [such as her father and Darcy] with agendas of their own".[8] The Bennet sisters have only a relatively small dowry of £1,000; and as their family's estate will pass out of their hands when their father dies, the family faces a major social decline, giving the Bennet girls only a limited time in which to find a husband.[9] About feminist criticism of the character, the French critic Roger Martin du Gard wrote that the primary purpose of Austen was to provide jouissance (enjoyment) to her readers, not preach, but the character of Elizabeth is able to manoeuvre within the male-dominated power structure of Regency England to assert her interests in a system that favours her father, Mr Darcy, and the other male characters.[10] Gard noted that the novel hardly glorifies patriarchy since it is strongly implied that it was the financial irresponsibility of Mr Bennet that has placed his family in a precarious social position.[10] Furthermore, it is Elizabeth who criticises her father for not doing more to teach her sisters Lydia and Catherine the value of a good character, which Mr Bennet disregards, leading to Lydia's eloping with Wickham.[11] Unlike the more superficial and/or selfish characters like Lydia, Wickham, Mr Collins, and Charlotte, who regard marriage as a simple matter of satisfying their own desires, for the more mature Elizabeth marriage is the cause of much reflection and serious thought on her part.[12]

The British literacy critic Robert Irvine stated that the reference in the novel to the militia being mobilised and lacking sufficient barracks, requiring them to set up camps in the countryside dates the setting of the novel to the years 1793–1795 as the militia was mobilised in 1793 after France declared war on Great Britain and the last of the barracks for the militia were completed by 1796.[13] Irvine argued that a central concern in Britain in the 1790s, when Austen wrote the first draft of Pride and Prejudice under the title First Impressions was the need for British elites, both national and regional to rally around the flag in face of the challenge from revolutionary France.[14] It is known that Austen was working on First Impressions by 1796 (it is not clear when she began working on the book) and finished off First Impressions in 1797.[15] Irvine states that the character of Elizabeth is clearly middle-class, while Mr Darcy is part of the aristocracy.[16] Irvine wrote "Elizabeth, in the end, is awed by Pemberly, and her story ends with her delighted submission to Darcy in marriage. It is gratitude that forms the foundation of Elizabeth Bennet's love for Fitzwilliam Darcy: caught in a reciprocal gaze with Darcy's portrait at Pemberly, impressed with the evidence of his social power that surrounds her, Elizabeth 'thought of his regard with a deeper sentiment of gratitude than it had ever raised before' ... Elizabeth's desire for Darcy does not happen despite the difference in their social situation: it is produced by that difference, and can be read as a vindication of the hierarchy which constructs that difference in the first place".[17] Irvine observes that Darcy spends about half his time in London while for people in Meryton London is a stylish place that is very far away, observing that a key difference is when one of the Bennet family is ill, they use the services of a local apothecary while Mr Darcy calls upon a surgeon from London.[18] In this regard, Irvine argued that the marriage of Elizabeth and Darcy stands for the union of local and national elites in Britain implicitly against the challenge to the status quo represented by the French Republic.[19]

By contrast, the American scholar Rachel Brownstein argued that Elizabeth rejects two offers of marriage by the time she arrives at Pemberley, and notes in rejecting Mr Collins that the narrator of the novel paraphrases the feminist Mary Wollstonecraft that Elizabeth cannot love him because she is "a rational creature speaking the truth from her heart".[20] Brownstein notes that it is reading Darcy's letter following her first rejection of him that leads her to say "Till this moment, I never knew myself".[21] Brownstein further states that Austen has it both ways in depicting Elizabeth as she uses much irony. After Elizabeth rejects Darcy and then realizes she loves him, she comments "no such happy marriage could now teach the admiring multitude what connubial felicity really was" as if she herself is aware that she is a character in a romance novel.[21] Later, she tells Darcy in thanking him for paying off Wickham's debts and ensuring Lydia's marriage that they might be in the wrong, "for what become of the moral, if our comfort springs from a breach of promise, for I ought not to have mentioned the subject?".[21]

Brownstein argues that Austen's ironical way of depicting Elizabeth allows her to present her heroine as both a "proto-feminist" and a "fairy-tale heroine".[21] At one point, Elizabeth says: "I am resolved to act in that manner, which will, in my own opinion, constitute my happiness, without reference to you, or to any other person wholly unconnected with me".[22] The American scholar Claudia Johnson wrote that this was a surprisingly strong statement for a female character in 1813.[22] Likewise, Elizabeth does not defer to the traditional elite, saying of Lady Catherine's opposition to her marrying Darcy: "Neither duty nor honor nor gratitude have any possible claim on me, in the present instance. No principle of either, would be violated by my marriage with Mr Darcy".[23] In the same, Elizabeth defends her love of laughter as somewhat life-improving by saying: "I hope I never ridicule what is wise or good".[23] Elizabeth regards herself as competent to judge what is "wise and good", and refuses to let others dictate to her what she may or may not laugh at, making her one of the most individualistic of Austen heroines.[23] However, Johnson noted that Austen hedged her bets here, reflecting the strict censorship imposed in Britain during the wars with France; Elizabeth reaffirms her wish to be part of the elite by marrying Darcy, instead of challenging it, as she says: "He is a gentleman; I am a gentleman's daughter; so far we are equal."[24] In the same way Austen avoids the issue of filial obedience – questioning of which would have marked her out as a "radical" – by having Mrs Bennet tell her daughter she must marry Collins where her father says she must not.[22] However, the way in which both Elizabeth's parents are portrayed as, if not bad parents, then at least not entirely good parents, implies that Elizabeth is more sensible and able to judge people better than both her mother and father, making her the best one to decide who her husband should be.[22] Reflecting her strong character, Elizabeth complains that Bingley is a "slave of his designing friends", noting for all his pleasantness that he does not have it in him to really stand up for himself; Johnson wrote the "politically potent metaphor" of describing Bingley as a "slave" was a potential reflection of Austen's abolitionist sentiments.[25]

Susan Morgan regards Elizabeth's major flaw to be that she is "morally disengaged" – taking much of her philosophy from her father, Elizabeth observes her neighbours, never becoming morally obligated to make a stand.[26] Elizabeth sees herself as an ironic observer of the world, making fun of those around her.[27] Elizabeth's self-destination is one of skepticism and opposition to the world around her, and much of the novel concerns her struggle to find her own place in a world she rejects.[28] At one point, Elizabeth tells Darcy: "Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies do divert me, I own, and I laught at them whenever I can".[29] Though Elizabeth is portrayed as intelligent, she often misjudges people around her because of her naivety – for example, misunderstanding the social pressures on her friend Charlotte to get married, being taken in completely for a time by Wickham and misjudging Darcy's character.[30] After hearing Wickham's account disparaging Darcy's character, and being advised by her sister Jane not to jump to conclusions, Elizabeth confidently tells her "I beg your pardon – one knows exactly what to think".[31]

However, Elizabeth is able to see, albeit belatedly, that Wickham had misled her about Darcy, admitting she was too influenced by "every charm of air and address".[32] Gary Kelly argued that Austen as the daughter of a Church of England minister would have been very familiar with the Anglican view of life as a "romantic journey" in which God watches over stories of human pride, folly, fall and redemption by free will and the ability to learn from one's mistakes.[33] Kelly argued that aspects of the Anglican understanding of life and the universe can be seen in Elizabeth, who, after rejecting Darcy and then receiving his letter explaining his actions, rethinks her view of him, and comes to understand that her pride and prejudice had blinded her to who he really was, marking the beginning of her romantic journey of "suffering and endurance" that ends happily for her.[34]

After seeing Pemberley, Elizabeth realizes Darcy's good character, and sees a chance to become part of society without compromising her values.[35] At Pemberley, Elizabeth sees the "whole scene" from one viewpoint and then sees the "objects were taking different positions" from another viewpoint while remaining beautiful, which is a metaphor for how her subjectivity had influenced her view of the world.[36] Like other Austen heroines, Elizabeth likes to escape into the gardens and nature in general when under pressure.[37] For Austen, gardens were not only places of reflection and relaxation, but also symbols of femininity and of England.[38] The American scholar Alison Sulloway wrote: "Austen had seen and suffered enough causal exploitation so that she took the pastoral world under her tender but unobtrusive fictional protection, just as she felt protective towards human figures under the threat of abuse or neglect".[39] Beyond that, Napoleon had often talked of a desire to make England's fair gardens and fields his own, speaking as if England "...was a mere woman, ripe for his exploitation", so for Austen, the beauty of the English countryside served as a symbol of the England her brothers serving in the Royal Navy were fighting to protect.[37] Elizabeth's connection with nature leads to appreciate the beauty of Pemberley, which allows hers to see the good in Darcy.[40] Notably, Elizabeth is not guided by financial considerations, and refuses to seek favour with the wealthy aristocrat Lady Catherine de Bourgh.[41] Despite Mr Darcy's wealth, Elizabeth turns down his first marriage proposal and only accepts him after she realises that she loves him.[42] Johnson wrote that given the values of Regency England, it was inevitable and expected that a young woman should be married, but Elizabeth makes it clear that what she wants is to marry a man she loves, not just to be married to somebody, which was a quietly subversive message for the time.[43]

In the early 19th century, there was a genre of "conduct books" settling out what were the rules for "propriety" for young women, and the scholar Mary Poovey argued in her 1984 book The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer, which examined the "conduct books", that one of the main messages was that a "proper young lady" never expresses any sexual desire for a man.[44] Poovey argued that in this context, Elizabeth's wit is a merely her way of defending herself from the rules of "propriety" set out by the conduct books as opposed to being a subversive force.[44] In this regard, Poovey argued that Austen played it safe by having Elizabeth abandon her wit when she falls in love with Darcy, taking her struggle into effort to mortify Darcy's pride instead of seeking him out because she loves him.[44] The conduct books used a double meaning of the word modesty, which meant both to be outwardly polite in one's conduct and to be ignorant of one's sexuality.[44] This double meaning of modesty placed women in a bind, since any young woman who outwardly conformed to expectations of modesty was not really modest at all, as she was attempting to hide her awareness of sexuality.[44] In the novel, when Elizabeth rejects Mr Collins's marriage proposal, she explains she is being modest in rejecting an offer from a man she cannot love, which leads her to be condemned for not really being modest.[44] Mr Collins often cites one of the more popular "conduct books", Sermons to Young Women, which was published in 1766, but was especially popular in the decades from 1790 to 1810.[45] Unlike the conduct books which declared that women should look back on the past as a way of self-examination, Elizabeth says: "Think only of the past as its remembrance gives you pleasure".[46]

Johnson wrote that changes in expectations for women's behavior since Austen's time has led many readers today to miss "Elizabeth's outrageous unconventionality" as she breaks many of the rules for women set out by the "conduct books".[45] Johnson noted that Collins approvingly quotes from Sermons to Young Women that women should never display any "briskness of air and levity of deportment", qualities that contrasted strongly with Elizabeth who has "a lively, playful disposition, which delighted in anything ridiculous".[47] The liveliness of Elizabeth also extends to the physical sphere, as she displays what Johnson called "an unladylike athleticism".[47] Elizabeth walks for miles, and constantly jumps, runs and rambles about, which was not considered conventional behavior for a well-bred lady in Regency England.[47] The narrator says that Elizabeth's temper is "to be happy", and Johnson wrote that her constant joy in life is what "makes her and her novel so distinctive".[48] Johnson wrote: "Elizabeth's relationship with Darcy resonates with a physical passion...The rapport between these two from start to finish is intimate, even racy".[49] Johnson wrote that the way in which Elizabeth and Darcy pursue each other in secret puts their relationship "on the verge of an impropriety unique in Austen's fiction".[49] Many of the remarks made by Elizabeth to Darcy such as "Despise me if you dare" or his "I am not afraid of you" resound with sexual tension, which reflected "Austen's implicit approval of erotic love".[50]

An unconventional character[edit]

In her letter to Cassandra dated 29 January 1813, Jane Austen wrote: "I must confess that I think her as delightful a creature as ever appeared in print, and how I shall be able to tolerate those who do not like her at least I do not know".[51] Austen herself wrote to Cassandra about one fan of her books that "Her liking Darcy & Elizth is enough".[52] The book notes that "Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies" are what delight Elizabeth, which Brownstein noted also applied to Austen as well.[53] This mix of energy and intelligence, and her gaiety and resilience make Elizabeth a true Stendhal heroine according to Tony Tanner, and he adds that there are not many English heroines that we can say that of.[54] Elizabeth Bowen, however, found her charmless, whilst to Edmund Crispin's fictional detective Gervase Fen she and her sisters were "intolerable...those husband-hunting minxes in Pride and Prejudice".[55]

In popular culture[edit]

The character of Elizabeth Bennet, marked by intelligence and independent thinking, and her romance with the proud Mr. Darcy have carried over into various theatrical retellings. Rosina Filippi's adapted Pride and Prejudice in a play called The Bennets which was performed at the Royal Court Theatre on 29 March 1901.[56] The play was directed by and featured Harcourt Williams and Winifred Mayo (as Elizabeth Bennet).[57]

Helen Fielding's novel Bridget Jones's Diary, as well as the film series of the same name, is a modern adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, with Elizabeth as Renée Zellweger's title character. In Gurinder Chadha's Bollywood adaptation, Bride and PrejudiceAishwarya Rai plays the Elizabeth character, Lalita Bakshi. In the 2008 television film Lost in Austen, actress Gemma Arterton plays a version of Lizzy who switches places with a modern-day young woman. Lily James starred as the zombie-slaying Elizabeth Bennet in the film version of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, a popular novel by Seth Grahame-Smith.[58] Fire Island is a modern day retelling of Pride and Prejudice, recasting the Bennett family as a queer found family, with screenwriter Joel Kim Booster starring as the Elizabeth corollary.[59]

One of the most notable portrayals of the character has been that of Jennifer Ehle in the 1995 BBC mini series Pride and Prejudice (1995 TV series) directed by Simon Langton. Ehle won the British Academy Television Award for the Best Actress in 1996. Keira Knightley in Pride & Prejudice, directed by Joe Wright was nominated at the Best Actress Academy Award for her performance.

The character has most recently been used in The Lizzie Bennet Diaries, a project which is partly headed by YouTube vlogger Hank Green, and depicts Elizabeth (played by Ashley Clements) as a modern-day woman in America posting video blogs about her life along with her friend 'Charlotte Lu' a character based on Charlotte Lucas.

Tuesday, 26 December 2023

PREVIOUS YEARS QUESTIONS PAPER |SUBJECT-INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY STUDIES

 


EDIT- RITU RAJ KUMAR
SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE CHANNEL
CHANNEL NAME-DIGITAL RITU RAJ
AAPKA EK SUPPORT CHIYA 
NOTES:ITNA TOH AAP HUMHARI LIYE KAR SAKTE HO(199) digital ritu raj - YouTube


THANKS

Monday, 25 December 2023

Kaul, A.N. ‘A New Province of Writing,’ The Domain of the Novel: Reflections on Some Historical Definitions notes

 A New Province of Writing , from the Domain of the novel: Reflections of some historical definitions. ( Pg 20-36) 



The Domain of the Novel
 
The Domain of the Novel: Reflections on Some Historical Definitions
discusses the genre of the novel and it's characteristics. 

A. N. Kaul (1930–2017)
Former Professor of English and former Pro-Vice Chancellor at the University of Delhi. His dissertation,
The American Vision: Actual and Ideal Society in Nineteenth-Century
Fiction, won both the John Addison Porter and George Egleston History
Prizes and was published by Yale University Press in 1963. 

Summary of the Text

A New Province of Writing

 - Kaul gave a general idea that if you have lived a life you can write at least one story, preferably
your own. One man/woman, one vote; one life, one novel! 
- fiction is the most democratic Literary genre.
- In this lectures Kaul states that his purpose is to go back in times to earliest novelist and focus on old fashioned novels to see where and how this all began. When he mentions old fashioned novels he meant 18th and 19th century when the novel first emerged in Europe. 
- domain of the novel is, and was
from the outset, an internally conflicted, a dialogical or dialectical domain 
-his prime focus is on some well known English writers
Here Kaul gives brief of his lectures, saying his 2nd lecture is ' Nationality and Novel' focusing on the novels produced in few countries example - 19th century Russia or late 19th century India. His 3rd lecture talks about 'Ideology and Novel'. 

He begins his first lecture on English novel with Henry Fielding who, when he turned from stage comedies and farces to
prose fiction, thought of himself as ‘the founder of a new province of writing’ (Tom Jones, Bk. 2, Ch. 1, 53), but his definations got contradictory. He defined the novel as ‘domestic history’ or simply
as the history, that is to say, the life or biography of one individual says Kaul. 

At one level this contradictions can be seen as neo-classical writer’s awe of the ancient classics.  The references to the classics like Homer or Aristotle proves that whatever seems new to us may just be the newer version of the old. As much as the novels of Fielding represents colonising of the new territory also the rehabilitation of the old literary terrain in several ways. 
- Kaul argues that epic may be rejected but it gets reinscribed. 
- Fielding called novels as a comic epic because it suggests the doublness betweencomic and the epic, the individual and the socio-historical, private life and the epochal which is seen in Fielding's as well as other novels upto the day. There is something Revolutionary in Fielding's theory of his rejection of epic hero as supernatural, mythological and extraordinary. 
-Another thing is the installation of comic  in the sense of the
commonplace, the ordinary, the topical, the matter of fact, protagonists of
low, even at times marginal, rank, engaged in living ordinary lives in commonplace pursuits of the commonest of commonplace goals etc. All the characters which were excluded from the stage in the epic were given opportunities like Richardson’s maidservant Pamela, Defoe’s picara Moll Flanders, Fielding’s own footman in Joseph Andrews, as well as the bastard Tom Jones. 

- As we move into the 19th century, the common people and the so called age of common man became very respectful more acceptable to society and literature,
their mainstream fable remains essentially the story of love, marriage and
private concerns.
- George Eliot herself uses the word ‘epic’ constantly but the correct describing word for her work would be epochal 

Kaul gave two anti- Fielding paradigms Why ‘comic epic’?
Why not ‘epic’ per se? Why not protagonists whose fable involves not only their destinies but all our destinies?

When the readers asked George Eliot Why?’ George Eliot did not write lengthy prefaces in the manner of Fielding. She answered that "he lived in an ample age ‘when the days were longer . . . when summer afternoons were spacious, and the clock ticked slowly in the winter evenings" . So every writer has his own history, condition and style of writing. 

Joyce’s hugely comic novel of consciousness, Ulysses, is not only titled after, but alludes constantly to, and reinvents, so to speak, one of the two or three founding epics of Western civilization. Kaul considers Lawrence's novels full of notorious sex as novels of cultural and class differentials.  E.M. Forster's novels are first and last novels of culture-conflict and mutual critique. 

Fielding has been much praised for his irony. It not only represents the individual but rather the collective portrait of the society of his time. Fielding’s novel is crowded. It is – but it is crowded not just by variety but by opposites, the opposite positions of the characters representing the two sides of some of the central political, social, intellectual and religious debates of the 18th century: Whig and Tory; Court and Country; the uncouth, fiercely independent country squire, Squire Western,
and his sister etc. 

Novels of 19th Century
- these novels
become openly recognizable – and are indeed commonly recognized – as
‘pictures of society’, not so much a moral critique as in Fielding but rather
a representation through individual stories of the very structure of 19thcentury British bourgeois society
- The most visibly important shift is, of course, the shift from the rural to
the urban, the foregrounding of the dominant bourgeoisie and the emergence of merchants, the merchant princes, as the new protagonists

- Barbara Hardy sees the 19th-century English novel as sociology and describes Thackeray as a ‘great sociologist’, ‘a great accumulator
of social symbols of class and money’ (20)

-What these early English novels do is to start with traditional moraluniversal categories – human nature, pride, vanity – and redefine them in
terms of contemporary, material realities. 

Mahesh Dattani, Tara Notes

 Tara Summary, Mahesh Dattani’s two-act play “Tara” tells the story of two conjoined twins, a boy, Chanda, and a woman, Tara, who are surgically separated in an unequal manner intended to favor the boy. The surgery that separated Chandan and Tara was so preferential to Chandan, in fact, that Tara is unable to survive and disadvantaged in every way growing up, eventually passes away. Chandan racked with guilt over Tara’s disadvantaged life and early death, moves from his native country of India to England, where he attempts to start life anew, repressing memories of his personal history and changing his name to the Westernized moniker “Dan.” Dattani’s play is meant to portray the struggle of an ancient Eastern civilization attempting to evolve to modern, Western values, and failing. The historically subordinate role of girls in Indian society and India’s ambitions of emerging as a serious global power commensurate with its one-billion-plus population and level of technological advancement. Cultural traditions that place far lower value on female life than thereon of a male also because the class structure that has Tara Summary, Characters, Themes Tara 64% OFF Popular Posts MEG 05 Literary Criticis m & Theory Solved Assignment 2022-23 MEG 05 LITERARY CRITICISM AND THEORY Solved Assignment... Tara Summa ry, Charact ers, Themes Tara By Mahesh Duttani Tara Summary, Mahesh... male, also because the class structure that has condemned many many Hindu Indians to lives of destitution while the upper classes still prosper, have sewn divisions in Indian society which will take generations to eliminate. During one important exchange between Chandan and his mother, Bharati, who was complicit with the choice to sacrifice Tara’s happiness and life in deference to the boy, tells Chandan with regard to Tara: “Let her get older . Yes, Chandan, the planet will tolerate you. the planet will accept you – but not her!” Chandan’s guilt over Tara is second only thereto of Bharati – a mother who has knowingly sacrificed her daughter due to cultural inhibitions against placing the worth of female life on an equivalent level as that of males. “Tara” may be a tragedy. In many cases, twins are known to possess an emotional connection that transcends that of other siblings. For the surgicallyseparated twins in “Tara,” that emotional bond similarly exists, but is forcibly separated by Bharati and her father, Patel. As Chandan notes, “The way we started in life. Two lives and one body in one comfortable womb. Till we were forced out – and separated.” In Tara Mahesh Dattani plays with the thought of female infanticide that's prevalent among the Gujaratis. His deep preoccupation with gender issues results in the emergence of the thought of the dual side to one’s self – quiet literally embodied in one body and therefore the separation that follows. Chandan and Tara are conjoined twins. they need to be separated for survival. the matter begins when it's recognized that it's been unequal, unfair operation. albeit the doctors were aware that the third leg would suit to Tara better than her brother, they took part during a conspiracy plotted by her family. As a result Chandan gets the second leg and Tara becomes a crippled. Bharati, the mother of Tara, is anxious about the longer term of her daughter. She was afraid that the planet wouldn't accept Tara when she may be a grown up. Her concerns and maternal love towards Tara becomes as a part of the burden of guilt she possess. Chandan enjoyed great preference, while Tara was left to enjoy the position of a subaltern. Tara was more enthusiastic and had high dreams and aspirations, which she couldn’t achieve since she was a handicapped. Bharati’s father further strengthened his indulgence for male grandchild by leaving his property after his demise to Chandan. When it involves giving the education Tara’s father prefers only Chandan. If Tara had been given moral support by her parents, her life wouldn't be an equivalent . It is noteworthy that discrimination against Tara continues even after her death. Chandan has changed their story into his own tragedy. He apologizes to Tara for doing so. Tara is usually discouraged, albeit she is more intelligent, sharp and witty. Economic and cultural facts are liable for the pathetic status of the girl child. of these factors combine to make the social organization during which the girl child has got to live. Tara is killed by the social organization , which controls the minds and actions of the people. Dattani seesTara as a play about the gendered self, about coming to terms with the female side of oneself during a world that favours always what's ‘male’. the standard of being effeminate may be a reason for shame inIndia. The playwright also seeks to portray science and nature during a similar manner. How Science and Nature complement one another. However Science cannot conquer everything and has its own lapses as Nature does. this is often signified by the twins with impaired legs as they form a reflection of every other. The play depicts how Science cannot always conquer Nature because the leg attributed to the boy is rejected by the body during a brash attempt at disregarding both Nature and God. Dan hits the nail on the top when he asserts” Conflict is that the crux of life. A duel to death between God and nature on one side and on other –the amazing Dr.Thakkar. This explains the God-like stance of the Doctor, who is seated with a seeming omnipotent presence representing Advanced Technology. Behind, on a better level, may be a chair during which Dr.Thakkar remains seated throughout the play. Although he doesn’t watch the action of the play, his connection is asserted by his Sheer God-like presence. The drama has two sides thereto with reference to the time frame-the past and therefore the present. It also reflects the virtual and therefore the real. An utterance sometimes refers to 2 different time frames with reference to time, occasion and therefore the statement applicable to different characters. the subsequent lines hold true for both Bharati and Dan as they're distant in time and space: If in the least they need to know, it'll be from me. Not from you. The twins, especially ‘Tara’, are repeatedly mentioned as “freaks”. The term ‘freak’ has been conventionally wont to ask one that has something unusual regarding their appearance or behaviour. The older usage of the word ‘freaks’ refers to the state of being physically deformed, or characterized by rare diseases and conditions. The word was utilized to suggest ‘sideshow performers’. In such an instance, the word ‘freak’ represents the state of girls , who are marginalized. the feminine race who aren't congenitally deformed but are so as society forces the handicap upon them. even as it's presented in concrete terms within the play:Tara’s leg is callously separated from her to render her twin brother normal, defying the tenets of Nature. It echoes Simone de Beauvoir’s dictum:” “One isn't born a lady one becomes one ” One isn t born a lady , one becomes one. A natural freak refers to a genetic disease, while a made freak may be a once normal one that experienced or initiated an alteration at some point in life (such as receiving surgical implants).Here both the terms are often wont to describe Dan and Tara. ButTarais less of a natural freak; as Nature was more in her favour. “Freak” has also been employed to explain genetic mutations in plants and animals, i.e. “freaks of nature.” “Freak” utilized in the verb form, implies: “to become stressed and upset”. Here, the twins are during a state of depression due to their predicament but utilize a curtain of sarcasm and wit to shield an equivalent . Man cannot accept the woman’s intellect, and gets intimidated by her intelligence.Tara’s victory at the cardboard game is seen as thorough cheating and Chandan is ashamed to admit her victory. He sees her as an honest business woman as she cheats at cards; not attributing it to her business acumen, but to her shrewdness.Taragets hurt at the remark because it holds no truth value. Even Patel ignores her future prospects and therefore the got to engage her in any meaningful endeavour. She is forced to evolve to the stereotype of the Indian Woman-devoid of any intellect, deemed fit only to perform mechanical household chores. In other words, a animal , which may be cared for, but not regarded with respect. Taraquips at this: “The men within the house were choosing whether or not they were going hunting while the ladies taken care of the cave.”(328) She highlights the plight of girls who were presumed to be suitable for the domestic domain only. The play as an entire thus depicts the relegation of the relevance of the lady , and her upper edge whenever it does assert itself during a maledominated society. this is often why the Grandfather and therefore the Mother who represent tradition prefer the male over the female; the Male is that the archetypal successor or prototype of cultural progeny. This explains why the author names the play after the feminine child whose identity is demoted otherwise; so as to invert the dialectical pair male/female. the lady has always been hailed in philosophy, but in practice she is treated as an object to be overlooked. As Woolf asserts in herA Room of One’s Own: ”Imaginatively, she is of the very best importance; practically she is totally insignificant. She pervades poetry from cover to cover; she is about absent from history.” In the prescribed play, though Bharati dotes on her daughter Tara she insensitively attributes a bit of her daughter Tara, she insensitively attributes a bit of her daughter to the son. The conflict between illusion and reality is once more echoed here. what's actually a public display of attention on a part of the mother is really a screen to shield her guilt. The context also is a satire on the self-sufficient Indian male, for whom, to simply accept anything feminine is beneath his dignity, and an indelible interrogation point on his masculinity. Even Dan acknowledges an equivalent , as he writes the play. Though the craft of the play is his, he has got to borrow the fabric from Tara. Aristotle had declared that ‘the female is female by virtue of a particular lack of qualities’ and added that ‘we should think of the feminine state, because it were, a deformity, one which occurs within the ordinary course of nature. On account of its weakness it quickly approaches its maturity and adulthood since inferior things all reach their end more quickly’(Generation of Animals trans.Peck) In Tara, the deformity of the lady is caused by the person , and caused so as to finish the person . The playwright utilizes the motif symbolically also . this is often the rationale why Tara approaches her end more quickly, and it's not due to her inferiority. The handicap also symbolizes the predicament of women in Indian families who are made to forsake their chances of getting educated because the edification of the boy becomes a priority. There is a regard to the woman of Shallot, who is imprisoned within a building made from “four gray walls and 4 gray towers.” It runs parallel to the plight of Tara who is jailed in her handicap and therefore the constraints of tradition. even as the woman of Shallot foresees her impending doom within the mirror,Tara senses her end too within the mirror represented by the expressions of her closest relatives. Both Tara and therefore the Lady of Shallot, find a release from their predicament only in death. The death of Tara features a more powerful impact than her existence. even as the death of the Star gives thanks to the region . The region stands for the God within the World of Physics, it being linked to the Male Gods in Hinduism like Shiva,Krishna, Ram. etc. who are black. Religion has also been predominantly patriarchal. Christianity professes: Men are God’s stars By naming his female protagonist as ‘Tara’, Mahesh Dattani puts it otherwise.

WILLAM BLAKE’S LIFE |NOTES|B A HONS ENGLISH |SEM-3|B A PROGRAMME

 BLAKE’S LIFE 1757 Born 28 November son of James Blake a hosier, near Golden Square in central London. 1768-72 Attended Henry Pars’s drawing...